![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by JDWeil; 01-28-2006 at 09:21 PM. |
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
My_Stinkin'_Cartoon_Blog! |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
-Dan Porceddu |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the screen caps, Dan (I'll take more, if you got 'em). The titles look very nice, I'm impressed. Too bad they have to have that horrid
"TV Y7" pasted over them... Geez, don't people know what's in a T&J cartoon by now? Do we really need that rating? |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm SURE that there will be any number of people making screen caps of the titles and then running them through a photo program and painting out that blasted "TV Y7" label shortly... And then editing the cleaned up titles back into their recorded copy... ![]() |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the rating was an option, then we won't see the TV-MA box on "South Park".
__________________
My Blog - Has some stuff Terrytoons 1957-71 filmography - new credits (updated 8-11) |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's kinda weird to see the WB shield where the MGM lion should be. Wouldn't it be interesting, now that WB is handling most of Turner's acquired classic animated characters that a LT/T&J crossover would be imminent.
Y'alls are probably thinking "GOD NO!", and personally, it doesn't really matter since studio execs will do whatever they want, and if the public doesn't like it, they'll just stick their fingers in their ears and go, "LA LA LA LA LA I DON'T HEEEEEEEEAR UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!" So, did the MGM cartoon fanfare play over the WB Cartoon title logo?
__________________
Support your favorite Golden Age Cartoons by purchasing their respective DVDs. If they don't have DVDs, let the studio who currently holds the rights to them know you want to see them on DVD. They may not listen, but you can tell them anyway.
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Honestly, I can't say it impressed me much, other than the design work. This was a nice looking short. If only it would convince more animatin houses to get away from the flat, ugly style many new cartoons use... The plot seemed derivative of a lot of other Tom and Jerry shorts, (the part where they were flying around in airplanes was starting to give me Filmation flashbacks
), the pacing seemed too fast, and they seemed to have this take place in too many locations. Spike as the "karateguard" really wasn't a very funny character. The formula seems a bit stale here. Maybe I've watched too many Tom and Jerry cartoons to find this funny. From 1940-1968 theatrically, with numerous short-lived revivals from 1975 up to 2006 has been quite an impressive run, but as much as I like them, perhaps it's time to let the cat and mouse retire and live on in repeats of their classic theatrical episodes.
__________________
http://www.fluffyandmervin.com Last edited by Debbie; 01-31-2006 at 12:03 AM. |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe I'm easy to please, but I enjoyed it.
Sure the plot was basically a remake - but Chuck Jones and Text Avery frequently remade their own plots back in the Golden Age as well. After years and years of mishandling ("The Magic Ring" "Tom & Jerry Kids," etc.), it was nice to see a cartoon that at least had the characters behaving "in character." I laughed out loud at a few of the gags (and I was watching by myself). Yes, the music track didn't seem quite right, but I still thought this was step in the right direction. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|