Gasmask Ted
08-12-2008, 08:26 PM
In a now closed thread, Tom Stathes asked:
"Why in the world would R&S films need DVNR? I can't imagine them having visual artifacts that film prints 50 years their senior might have."
Five years ago tomorrow Steve Worth said in a.a.spumco:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animation.spumco/msg/ef575ab91171b8cc?dmode=source
"The problem with some of the original episodes of R&S was that the
overseas film labs were very sloppy, and there was a lot of dirt on the
negatives when they were telecined. The cleanup that TNN did was
entirely done by hand frame by frame. Human eyes and brains did the
cleaning up, not a computer. They didn't do anything but remove dirt...
no color correcting, no grain smoothing, no digital bungling at all."
(Frighteningly, this means APC was done showing new episodes on TNN five years ago.)
"Why in the world would R&S films need DVNR? I can't imagine them having visual artifacts that film prints 50 years their senior might have."
Five years ago tomorrow Steve Worth said in a.a.spumco:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animation.spumco/msg/ef575ab91171b8cc?dmode=source
"The problem with some of the original episodes of R&S was that the
overseas film labs were very sloppy, and there was a lot of dirt on the
negatives when they were telecined. The cleanup that TNN did was
entirely done by hand frame by frame. Human eyes and brains did the
cleaning up, not a computer. They didn't do anything but remove dirt...
no color correcting, no grain smoothing, no digital bungling at all."
(Frighteningly, this means APC was done showing new episodes on TNN five years ago.)